<< back | contents | next >>

B. 1) Considerations in Developing an Activity Programme


i) Selecting an Activity

Matching the right activity with the needs of the particular Service Users is of critical importance and should be arrived at after discussions between the support staff, the woodland activity staff and the Service Users themselves. Woodlands offer such a choice of activities that the development and delivery of the service should be able to meet users’ needs precisely.

  • Decide what the objectives of the activity are in terms of increasing physical activity, self-esteem or developing social skills etc.

  • Have an array of options on offer for the Service Users to try out.

  • Beneficiaries must have an input into the planning of the activity.

  • A pilot or taster activity is often a good idea before developing a definitive programme.

  • Do not be too ambitious; build confidence with small, easily attained goals.

  • Try and overcome cultural barriers in certain circumstances and do not assume that the Service User has an immediate appreciation of being outdoors or shares your personal environmental values.

  • Be aware of the differences and inequalities among beneficiaries so that activities encourage a wider and inclusive participation.

  • Producing something tangible is important in building confidence but do not let the end goal be so intimidating that satisfaction in the process is lost.

  • Above all make sure that the activity is fun and enjoyable.

  • The Par – Q guidelines will help Service Users assess whether they should consult a Doctor before initiating a physical activity programmes


ii) Group Size

This depends on the activity undertaken and the individual needs of the Service User. Simple woodland management activities like brashing (pruning trees) can be undertaken by a relatively large group, as this has a low hazard potential and needs little supervision and induction. An activity like pole lathing is more skilled and will require either higher levels of supervision or smaller groups so that fewer people are kept waiting.


iii) Supervision Levels

The Health or Support Worker will know what levels of supervision are necessary for the personal care of their individual Service Users. It is important to select an activity to match the levels of supervision available so that as many beneficiaries as possible can be active at any one time.


iv) Duration, Frequency and Continuity

The current recommendations for physical activity in adults is at least 30 minutes moderate activity five times a week, to benefit health. It will be difficult to provide this level of supervision for hard to reach members of the community who may not be able or willing to undertake this lifestyle change on their own. The objective of a programme aimed at this sector of society is to provide a structure for encouraging and rewarding participation. From evidence based practice in Wales it would appear that 4 hours of supervised sessions once a week for 6 months would provide an optimum level of benefit to health from woodland activities. The long term goal of any health and wellbeing programme should be to stimulate independent exercise of 30 minutes, 5 times a week however.

v) Evaluation and Evidence Gathering

It is important to set project outcomes both for the Service Users’ benefit and for project partners and funders. Decide on what indicators will be used to assess the progress of each individual participant. It is obviously important not to intimidate the beneficiaries with these parameters at the beginning at the project. Project evaluation should also be carried out so that evidence can be presented to help influence policy regarding outdoor exercise. It is preferable that this is done in a standardised format so that information can be correlated with other initiatives. The Walking the Way to Health Initiative has carried out both national and local project evaluations using standardised questionnaires. Walking the way to health: WHI evaluation reports 2006

Another self-evaluation tool is the MYMOP, Measure Yourself Medical Outcome Profile: www.hsrc.ac.uk/mymop/main.htm. This provides a simple one page questionnaire, with which the Service User identifies one or two symptoms that they consider to be most important to them, scoring their severity on a seven point system. A further questionnaire is filled out after the activity has been undertaken so that progress can be evaluated.


vi) Planning for Sustainability

If funding has been secured and expectations have been created it is important to plan the project to be sustained beyond the funding period. Two Walking the Way to Health groups provide case studies, demonstrating how they achieved this when their coordinators’ funding period ended.

 
 

(Top)

 
 

 
     

Coed Lleol is hosted by the Small Woods Association in partnership with the Forestry Commission Wales and the Countryside Council for Wales

 
       
    Logo of the Forestry Commission       Logo of the Small Woods Association      Logo of the Countryside Council for Wales      Logo of the Welsh Assembly Government
       

© Coed Lleol 2005

Web design by Itsnoprob.co.uk

Extended Web development by CookieOnline.net